Quote of the month:
During a chess competition a chessmaster should be a combination of a beast of prey and a monk - Alekhine.         

Issue 8 (5 Sept 2007)

 

Home     |         Links       |     Archives     |       Leave a Message      |     Photo gallery 


proud to be a  
chess player 

Home
Links
Archives
Leave a message ****
Photo Gallery
  


By Larry Parr 
Chess Life Editor 1984 - 1988
Author

 

  WORSE THAN A CRIME?   
(Continued)  

   

WHEN CHESS GODS BLUNDER (I)

  Grandmasters commit shocking blunders every day.  Even the gods of chess - the world champions from Philidor to Kramnik - have hung pieces and overlooked mates.  No one can answer Friedrich Nietzsche’s conundrum - “What is it:  is man only a blunder of God, or God only a blunder of man” - but we all ought to know that man is the blunderer of chess.  Yet one constantly hears chess writers describe a blunder as “unbelievable.”  Believe it!  Chess would have no pretensions beyond being sophisticated checkers unless its inherent difficulty prevented true mastery of its intricacies and pitfalls.

     Still more amazing than chess scribblers entering shock when a Capablanca loses a piece before move 10 or an Anatoly Karpov resigns as White on move 12 is the tendency of the great masters themselves - the very people who know how vulnerable they are to error -  to overlook astonishing mistakes made by their fellow masters.  Rodney Dangerfield says that he “don’t get no respect,” while international-level masters frequently accord one another too much respect.

     In Ebralidze-Ragozin (Soviet Championship, 1937), the Black player, who was one of the leading Soviet grandmasters of the 1930s and 1940s, made one of the great blunders in chess history.  

Ragozin (to play)

Ebralidze

40. .... Rc7???

       Black’s idea is that he wins the Bishop vs. Knight ending after 41. Rxc7 Bd6+ -- or, more accurately, double check, one of which is a discovery on his own King.

41. Rd5???

       The White player was a fine, positional master who was Tigran Petrosian’s first trainer.  What makes this counter-blunder so astonishing is that directly after Black’s blunder, a spectator shouted, “Archil, take the rook!”  Ebralidze replied, “I can see - don’t interfere!”  Whereupon, he played the text rather than 41. Rxc7.  As the commotion grew in the tournament hall, Ebralidze finally realized his error, clutching his head in despair.  What happened?  White believed blindly in the authority of his famous opponent.  That’s what happened!  

41 ... Bf6  42. Nb5 Rc2+  43. Kg3 a6  44. Rd7+ Ke8  45. Rc7 Be5+, White resigns  


Final position. 

Last updated 5 September 2007